A New Concept of Freedom
07-13-2024Roger Berkowitz
The 2024 Alpine Fellowship took place last weekend in Tuscany. The last three years the Hannah Arendt Center has had the opportunity to co-sponsor The Alpine Fellowship, a themed gathering of inquisitive people from all across the world. Very much like Arendt Center Conferences, The Alpine Fellowship picks a topic (this year it was “language”) and curates a series of discussions, talks, performances and workshops around that theme. Both these gatherings incorporate poetry, literature, philosophy, and the humanities to think deeply about our world. But the Alpine Fellowship also emphasizes a holistic approach to character, offering workshops in Yoga, Cranial Sacral healing, breathing work, the power of silence, and more. And the Alpine Fellowship brings its participants into nature, taking hikes and embracing early morning plunges into mountain lakes and rambling rivers. At the root of the Alpine Fellowship is the idea that any meaningful community depends on a strong and grounded sense of self. There is no political freedom without individuals capable of exercising freedom.
How one teaches character, and if it can be taught, are important questions. Arendt herself connected character with the practice of thinking. It is thinking, she imagines, that might inspire a person to see the world from multiple perspectives and thus could free one from parochial prejudices and the lure of ideology, thus liberating man to embrace a broader common sense. It is in thinking that we let ourselves go wandering and think from the perspectives of many others—only then can modern men ground themselves in a common sense world that we share with others. For Arendt, character is something that emerges with the thinking person. Most often, Arendt argues, thinking is something that is only taught by example. But it is also possible to “exercise” our capacity for thought. Arendt’s essays in her book Between Past and Future are imagined as exercises in thinking. And it may be that engaging in thoughtful encounters with other persons and with oneself can also offers such exercises in thinking.
Character, today, is sought in ways beyond thinking. One way to expand our minds and connect with a world beyond ourselves is through mindfulness and attention to the natural and spiritual worlds around us. By steeling our selves through silence, attentiveness, and awareness, the hope is that we ground ourselves in ways that make true community possible.
The reason the Alpine Fellowship’s mix of intellectual and holistic learning strikes me as important is because of what N.S. Lyons calls the “paradox of individual autonomy.” The paradox is simple. The more we live within large, bureaucratic, and increasingly automated systems of government, media, and social life, the more desperately we crave a kind of rebellious individualism that protects us from the rising uniformity and conformity of what Hannah Arendt called “the social.” But the reactive individualism that bureaucracy inspires leads, in turn, to the kind of loneliness and atomism that is attracted to mass totalitarian movements.
The great German writer Ernst Jünger worried that “Man has immersed himself too deeply in [his] constructions,” that he has “lost contact with the ground. This brings him close to catastrophe, to great danger, toward destruction.” As I participated in the Alpine Fellowship this year, I thought of Ernst Jünger’s recognition that we are, today, confronted with a new kind of power that demands that we call forth a new experience of freedom. Jünger writes:
Reflecting on Jünger’s call for a new concept of freedom, N.S. Lyons writes:
Moreover, I believe Jünger helps resolve a paradox that I at least have wrestled with for some time (especially as a freedom-loving American): the paradox of individual autonomy. The paradox is this: we subsist under an increasingly totalizing and oppressive managerial regime, in which a vast impersonal hive-mind of officious bureaucrats and ideological programmers aims to surveil, constrain, and manage every aspect of our lives, from our behavior to our associations and even our language and beliefs. This rule-by-scowling-HR manager could hardly feel more collectivist – we’re trapped in a “longhouse” ruled over by controlling, emasculating, spirit-sapping, safety-obsessed nannies. Naturally, our instinct is to sound a barbaric yawp of revolt in favor of unrestrained individual freedom. And yet, as I’ve endeavored to explain several times before, it is also a kind of blind lust for unrestrained individualism that got us stuck here in the first place…
The paradox is that the more individuals are liberated from the restraints imposed on them by others (e.g. relational bonds, communal duties, morals and norms) and by themselves (moral conscience and self-discipline), the more directionless and atomized they become; and the more atomized they become, the more vulnerable and reliant they are on the safety offered by some greater collective. Alone in his “independence,” the individual finds himself dependent on a larger power to protect his safety and the equality of his proliferating “rights” (desires) from the impositions of others, and today it is the state that answers this demand. Yet the more the state protects his right to consume and “be himself” without restraint, the less independently capable and differentiated he becomes, even as his private affairs increasingly become the business of the expanding state.
Subject to the impersonal regulations of mechanistic processes and procedures rather than his own judgement or that of the people in close communion with him, the individual is molded into a more and more uniform cog to fit into the machine: a mere passive “consumer” and easily manipulated and programmed puppet – an automaton – rather than a true individual actor. In the effort to maximize his autonomy, his real autonomy has been lost.
Such an individual has succumbed to what Jünger fittingly describes as the all-encompassing “automatism” of our modern age, in which more and more of human life seems reduced to “mere functionality” and constrained by unliving mechanistic processes. Even our minds become subject to ideological machine code alongside base desires. And it is out of this loss of our humanity that totalitarianism and its atrocities are born.
To escape this automatism, achieve real individuality, and recover our humanity will require us to find a “new freedom” – or rather, an older and nobler freedom – that reconciles liberty with duty, independence with love, life with sacrifice, and the barbarian with the saint. This is the passage to freedom that Jünger seeks to offer us.
Jünger also has much to say about the rise of artificial intelligence and robots. You can read a short essay about Jünger’s novella The Bees here.