Skip to main content.
Bard HAC
Bard HAC
  • About sub-menuAbout
    Hannah Arendt

    “There are no dangerous thoughts; thinking itself is dangerous.”

    Join HAC
    • About the HAC
      • About Hannah Arendt
      • Book Roger
      • Our Team
      • Our Location
  • Programs sub-menuPrograms
    Hannah Arendt
    • Our Programs
    • Courage to Be
    • Democracy Innovation Hub
    • Virtual Reading Group
    • Dialogue Groups
    • HA Personal Library
    • Affiliated Programs
    • Hannah Arendt Humanities Network
    • Meanings of October 27th
    • Lapham's Quarterly
  • Academics sub-menuAcademics
    Hannah Arendt

    “Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining it.”

    • Academics at HAC
    • Undergraduate Courses
  • Fellowships sub-menuFellowships
    HAC Fellows

    “Action without a name, a 'who' attached to it, is meaningless.”

    • Fellowships
    • Senior Fellows
    • Associate Fellows
    • Student Fellowships
  • Conferences sub-menuConferences
    JOY: Loving the World in Dark Times Conference poster

    Fall Conference 2025
    “JOY: Loving the World in Dark Times”

    October 16 – 17

    Read More Here
    • Conferences
    • Past Conferences
    • Registration
    • Our Location
    • De Gruyter-Arendt Center Lecture in Political Thinking
  • Publications sub-menuPublications
    Hannah Arendt
    Subscribe to Amor Mundi

    “I've begun so late, really only in recent years, to truly love the world ... Out of gratitude, I want to call my book on political theories Amor Mundi.”

    • Publications
    • Amor Mundi
    • Quote of the Week
    • HA Yearbook
    • Podcast: Reading Hannah Arendt
    • Further Reading
    • Video Gallery
    • From Our Members
  • Events sub-menuEvents
    Hannah Arendt

    “It is, in fact, far easier to act under conditions of tyranny than it is to think.”

    —Hannah Arendt
    • HAC Events
    • Upcoming
    • Archive
    • JOY: Loving the World in Dark Times Conference
    • Bill Mullen Recitation Prize
  • Join sub-menu Join HAC
    Hannah Arendt

    “Political questions are far too serious to be left to the politicians.”

    • Join HAC
    • Become a Member
    • Subscribe
    • Join HAC
               
  • Search

Amor Mundi

Amor Mundi Home

 

Video Archives - “Blogging and the New Public Intellectual – A Conversation with Jay Rosen and Megan Garber” (2013)

09-12-2014

October 27, 2013: “Blogging and the New Public Intellectual – A Conversation with Jay Rosen and Megan Garber”

Participants:

-- Roger Berkowitz, Associate Professor of Political Studies and Human Rights and Academic Director of the Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and the Humanities, Bard College.
-- Walter Russell Mead, James Clarke Chace Professor of Foreign Affairs and the Humanities, Bard College.
-- Jay Rosen, Professor of Journalism, NYU.
-- Megan Garber, media critic and staff writer, The Atlantic.

Roger Berkowitz and Walter Russell Mead of Bard College have a discussion with Jay Rosen and Megan Garber about the state of journalism today.

[caption id="attachment_14313" align="alignleft" width="200"]rosen Jay Rosen[/caption]

Rosen begins the discussion by painting a general picture of what the modern-day journalist is like. In his mind, the journalist’s province lies somewhere between an academic’s concern with the past and the reporter’s concern with the present. He points to the era of Thomas Paine as a potential model for understanding the present and future of journalism as a form of political participation undertaken by informed citizens. However, in our time, the Internet has transformed journalism, providing a public platform to anyone with anything to say—even if they have only one thing to say and are not equipped equipped to say it.

Garber focuses in on the publication of both “hard” and “soft” stories on single news venues. She talks about the “high-low approach” whereby a website covers both trivial, fun topics as well as issues of greater gravity. Mead asks her at one point about how she selects what she wishes to investigate, which prompts Garber to elaborate further on the balance between what’s fun and what’s important.

[caption id="attachment_14311" align="alignright" width="200"]garber Megan Garber[/caption]

Leading off of Garber’s commends, Mead criticizes the way some worthwhile stories in the press get washed out by a deluge of reports that don’t merit as much attention. He points to the coverage of the budget crisis in Congress at the time, which overshadowed news of a significant shift in Sino-Japanese relations. Mead thinks that the foreign policy story, with potentially enormous ramifications for the coming century, received less than adequate treatment because the press is easily led into runaway coverage by a media-savvy Washington establishment. There are some stories, he remarks, that are made for the press. These press-ready events then overshadow more organically played-out stories.

For readers interested in the issue of public truth-telling, a matter close to Arendt’s heart, this is a discussion that provides insight into the current discourse surrounding journalism and the practice of public reporting.

Analysis by Dan Perlman

You can watch the full conversation below:

Blogging and the New Public Intellectual- - A Conversation with Jay Rosen and Megan Garber from Hannah Arendt Center on Vimeo.

Footer Contact
Contact HAC
Bard College
PO Box 5000
Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504
845-758-7878
[email protected]
Join the HAC
Become a Member
Subscribe to Amor Mundi
Join the Virtual Reading Group
Follow Us
Image for Twitter
Image for Facebook
Image for YouTube
Image for Instagram