Skip to main content.
Bard HAC
Bard HAC
  • About sub-menuAbout
    Hannah Arendt

    “There are no dangerous thoughts; thinking itself is dangerous.”

    Join HAC
    • About the HAC
      • About Hannah Arendt
      • Book Roger
      • Our Team
      • Our Location
  • Programs sub-menuPrograms
    Hannah Arendt
    • Our Programs
    • Courage to Be
    • Democracy Innovation Hub
    • Virtual Reading Group
    • Dialogue Groups
    • HA Personal Library
    • Affiliated Programs
    • Hannah Arendt Humanities Network
    • Meanings of October 27th
    • Lapham's Quarterly
  • Academics sub-menuAcademics
    Hannah Arendt

    “Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining it.”

    • Academics at HAC
    • Undergraduate Courses
  • Fellowships sub-menuFellowships
    HAC Fellows

    “Action without a name, a 'who' attached to it, is meaningless.”

    • Fellowships
    • Senior Fellows
    • Associate Fellows
    • Student Fellowships
  • Conferences sub-menuConferences
    JOY: Loving the World in Dark Times Conference poster

    Fall Conference 2025
    “JOY: Loving the World in Dark Times”

    October 16 – 17

    Read More Here
    • Conferences
    • Past Conferences
    • Registration
    • Our Location
    • De Gruyter-Arendt Center Lecture in Political Thinking
  • Publications sub-menuPublications
    Hannah Arendt
    Subscribe to Amor Mundi

    “I've begun so late, really only in recent years, to truly love the world ... Out of gratitude, I want to call my book on political theories Amor Mundi.”

    • Publications
    • Amor Mundi
    • Quote of the Week
    • HA Yearbook
    • Podcast: Reading Hannah Arendt
    • Further Reading
    • Video Gallery
    • From Our Members
  • Events sub-menuEvents
    Hannah Arendt

    “It is, in fact, far easier to act under conditions of tyranny than it is to think.”

    —Hannah Arendt
    • HAC Events
    • Upcoming
    • Archive
    • JOY: Loving the World in Dark Times Conference
    • Bill Mullen Recitation Prize
  • Join sub-menu Join HAC
    Hannah Arendt

    “Political questions are far too serious to be left to the politicians.”

    • Join HAC
    • Become a Member
    • Subscribe
    • Join HAC
               
  • Search

HAC Events

View All HAC Events

Talk by Michiel Bot: The Politics of Offense *MOVED*

Monday, March 3, 2014
Olin Humanities, Room 202
6:00 pm

This event occurred on:  Giving and taking offense have taken center stage on the political scene since the end of the Cold War and especially since 9/11. Think, for instance, of the controversy following the publication of the Danish cartoons of the prophet Muhammad in 2005, and of the peculiar way in which various Western European right-wing populists combine indignation with deliberate “political incorrectness,” presenting their anti-immigrant or anti-Islam rhetoric as a liberation from “multicultural censorship.”

In this presentation, Bot argues that giving and taking offense play an important role not only in establishing, but also in negotiating and critiquing affective investments in shared norms, and that this is important for democratic politics. Thus, Bot argues against “intellectualist” conceptions of democratic politics that either consider offense a threat to discussion in a purely rational public sphere (along Habermasian lines), or that mandate that “what can be offended must be offended” in order to liberate all citizens from their by definition “irrational” affective investments (along Nietzschean lines).

Bot also argues against theories of tolerance or multiculturalism that are premised on the claim that giving offense should always be avoided in the name of respect for difference or “modus vivendi.” Instead, Bot proposes that giving offense is central to the intimately connected practices of democracy and critique, which always involve challenging established moral, political, and aesthetic hierarchies, or what Jacques Rancière calls established partitions/sharings of “the sensible.” Taking offense, on the other hand, can be a critical move against attempts to invalidate all expressions of indignation as illegitimate interferences of moral or religious feeling in a public sphere that ought to be kept strictly “rational,” amoral, and “secular.” Closely examining what it means to give and take offense and to be offended, Bot situates his argument in relation to recent instances of the “affective turn” in political theory, from Sara Ahmed’s Cultural Politics of Emotion to Lars Tønders’ Tolerance: A Sensorial Orientation to Politics.
Footer Contact
Contact HAC
Bard College
PO Box 5000
Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504
845-758-7878
[email protected]
Join the HAC
Become a Member
Subscribe to Amor Mundi
Join the Virtual Reading Group
Follow Us
Image for Bluesky
Image for YouTube
Image for Instagram
Image for LinkedIn